RHO on the Dyno

cconnorhtx

Active member
Founding Member ⚙️
Joined
Sep 8, 2024
Messages
79
Media
2
Reaction score
126
Military
US Army
Current Ride
2025 Ram RHO
Current Ride #2
2022 911 Carrera S
Well these guys got a new RHO and disconnected the front driveshafts, then hit the dyno.

Numbers look very good for stock (460whp / 466 tq)


1735050929444.webp
 
How much are we losing by having the front driveshaft hooked up though?
 
View attachment 1895
Only about 120 horsepower less and 90 torque to the wheels compared to my stock Trx made, nothing a quick tune wouldn’t make up for lol can’t wait to mod the rho!
A hundred(ish) pounds off the nose with the RHO will also be helpful with weight distribution at launch. Just a JB4 will definitely put it up there with a stock TRX
 
I find it amusing how so many people are hung up with acceleration on a truck basically designed for off roading.
 
What’s the difference between red and blue lines?
 
BMW is notorious for underrating actual power/hp levels their engines are making. Specifically/Currently the B/S58 inline six cylinder turbo motors in particular.

Why they choose do to this I do not know...but love it! Loving my wife's base B58 X5, and about to put a JB4 on it.

It's generally accepted that whatever power level BMW says is the WHEEL horsepower being made, not crank. Maybe Ram is doing the same with the RHO?
 
Ok the B58's have made their rated crank horsepower at the wheels.... But they're also not exceeding it by 100whp. I was looking at the graph posted above and not reading - that's his TRX, not his RHO. So nevermind my jibberish.
 

Trending content

Back
Top